Public sector
Information system interoperability programme
Secure the requirements, the functional governance and the quality of deliverables on an interoperability programme.
- Interoperability
- Governance
- Requirements
Governance, Compliance & Quality Assurance
IS & programme governance
Structure the bodies, the responsibilities, the traceability of requirements and the phase-passage conditions of a transformation programme.
EN UNE PHRASE
Governance exists to decide, not to meet.
THE PROBLEM
The situations that bring us in
- 01
Decisions are taken outside the bodies, then contested later.
- 02
Nobody is named as responsible for a requirement or a deliverable.
- 03
Risks are listed but trigger no action.
- 04
Milestones are passed without the criteria being checked.
- 01THE PROBLEM
A programme whose structuring decisions dissolve between the parties, and whose milestones lose their meaning.
- 02WHAT AXENEO DOES
We define the bodies and their mandate, the responsibility matrix, the repository of traced requirements and the quality gates with their criteria.
- 03THE RESULT
Decisions documented, responsibilities owned, and milestones whose passing can be demonstrated.
What we do
Governance framework
- Bodies, mandates and escalation circuits
- Responsibility matrix and roles
- Requirements repository and traceability matrix
- Risk register and mitigation plans
Control
- Quality gates and passage criteria
- Acceptance criteria for deliverables
- Deliverable reviews and minutes that stand up to scrutiny
- Governance indicators and reporting
The Governance, Compliance & Quality Assurance method
This domain sits within the pillar’s overall method.
- 01
Scoping
Quality enters the project with the scoping: requirements formalised, testable, prioritised and linked to an identified need.
- 02
Requirements
Every requirement gets an owner, an acceptance criterion and a link to the test that will verify it. Traceability is built as you go, not reconstructed afterwards.
- 03
Quality plan
Roles, expected deliverables, reviews, quality gates and go-live conditions. The setup is sized to what the programme is worth.
- 04
Testing
Test strategy by level, coverage reported against requirements, representative data sets and controlled environments.
- 05
Validation
Functional validation, integration, regression. Gaps are qualified and settled in governance, not absorbed quietly.
- 06
Compliance
Where a standard applies, the body of evidence and the remediation plans are built continuously, through to the audit.
USE CASES
Where we step in
Multi-party programme
Several organisations, several suppliers: define who decides what, on what basis and at what moment.
Functional governance
Keep a programme functionally coherent when its workstreams advance at different speeds.
Related case studies
Public sector
Harmonising project management practices
Give a public institution a shared project management framework, so that projects become comparable and trade-offs possible.
- PMO
- Project management
- Governance
Business services
Structuring support and service management
Professionalise how user requests are handled, moving from ad-hoc treatment to a genuine service management framework.
- ITSM
- Application support
- Service Management
Contact
IS & programme governance: let’s talk about your context
Whether the subject is a programme to secure, an acceptance process to structure or a certification to prepare, the first question is the same: what exactly are we committing to, and how do we demonstrate it?